Bite-sized separation of concerns
We often find ourselves with a medium-sized chunk of behavior that we’d like to extract, but only mix in to a single class.
Extracting a plain old Ruby object to encapsulate it and collaborate or delegate to the original object is often a good choice, but when there’s no additional state to encapsulate or we’re making DSL-style declarations about the parent class, introducing new collaborators can obfuscate rather than simplify.
The typical route is to just dump everything in a monolithic class, perhaps with a comment, as a least-bad alternative. Using modules in separate files means tedious sifting to get a big-picture view.
Dissatisfying ways to separate small concerns
Using comments:
class Todo < ApplicationRecord
# Other todo implementation
# ...
## Event tracking
has_many :events
before_create :track_creation
private
def track_creation
# ...
end
end
With an inline module:
Noisy syntax.
class Todo < ApplicationRecord
# Other todo implementation
# ...
module EventTracking
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
included do
has_many :events
before_create :track_creation
end
private
def track_creation
# ...
end
end
include EventTracking
end
Mix-in noise exiled to its own file:
Once our chunk of behavior starts pushing the scroll-to-understand-it boundary, we give in and move it to a separate file. At this size, the increased overhead can be a reasonable tradeoff even if it reduces our at-a-glance perception of how things work.
class Todo < ApplicationRecord
# Other todo implementation
# ...
include TodoEventTracking
end
Introducing Module#concerning
By quieting the mix-in noise, we arrive at a natural, low-ceremony way to separate bite-sized concerns.
class Todo < ApplicationRecord
# Other todo implementation
# ...
concerning :EventTracking do
included do
has_many :events
before_create :track_creation
end
private
def track_creation
# ...
end
end
end
Todo.ancestors
# => [Todo, Todo::EventTracking, ApplicationRecord, Object]
This small step has some wonderful ripple effects. We can
-
grok the behavior of our class in one glance,
-
clean up monolithic junk-drawer classes by separating their concerns, and
-
stop leaning on protected/private for crude “this is internal stuff” modularity.
Prepending concerning
concerning
supports a prepend: true
argument which will prepend
the concern instead of using include
for it.
Methods
Instance Public methods
concern(topic, &module_definition)
A low-cruft shortcut to define a concern.
concern :EventTracking do
...
end
is equivalent to
module EventTracking
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
...
end
📝 Source code
# File activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/module/concerning.rb, line 132
def concern(topic, &module_definition)
const_set topic, Module.new {
extend ::ActiveSupport::Concern
module_eval(&module_definition)
}
end
🔎 See on GitHub
concerning(topic, prepend: false, &block)
Define a new concern and mix it in.
📝 Source code
# File activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/module/concerning.rb, line 114
def concerning(topic, prepend: false, &block)
method = prepend ? :prepend : :include
__send__(method, concern(topic, &block))
end
🔎 See on GitHub